Lemberg Solutions vs Delve: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Delve (4.0/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected and smart medical devices, one engineering team. Delve is the stronger option for user research and industrial design for medtech. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Delve: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Delve |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2021 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Madison, WI, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 200–500 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together | Design research and industrial design depth from two long-established US studios |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, phased fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, RTOS, FPGA | SolidWorks, Usability engineering, Rapid prototyping |
| Industries served | Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health, Automotive, Energy, Logistics | Wearables & remote monitoring, Surgical & therapeutic devices, Consumer products, Industrial |
Lemberg Solutions vs Delve: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Founded in 2007, Lemberg Solutions builds both hardware and software, and has offices in Lviv, Hamburg, London and Kraków. For medical device teams it covers electrical engineering, firmware, RTOS and embedded Linux development, FPGA programming, GUI work, connectivity and IoT, edge AI and cybersecurity, so one vendor can own the device electronics, its embedded code and the cloud or mobile side that talks to it. Healthcare is one of its core industries alongside automotive, energy and logistics, and named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth. The company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification and runs its own hardware lab. It does not manufacture finished devices at volume and does not obtain regulatory clearance on a client's behalf; it supplies the engineering documentation the client's regulatory team needs.
Delve
Delve is a product design and innovation firm headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin, with studios in Boston, Philadelphia and San Francisco. Trinity Hunt Partners bought it in 2021 and merged it with Philadelphia's Bresslergroup (founded 1970), and the combined business now operates under the Delve name and later acquired digital design firm altr. Its team is estimated at 200 to 500 people. Delve says it designed and engineered the Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitor (per company website; independently unverifiable), and medical devices are a large share of its work alongside consumer and industrial products.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Delve
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Delve |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✗ |
| SaMD & companion apps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connected devices & IoT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Industrial design & human factors | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mechanical engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| Device cybersecurity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Regulatory & QMS support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Manufacturing & scale-up | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Delve
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Delve |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C/C++ | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| Cloud (AWS/Azure) | ✓ | N/A |
| IEC 62304 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 14971 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 13485 QMS | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Delve
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Delve |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Consulting, Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Delve
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Delve |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health | Wearables & remote monitoring, Surgical & therapeutic devices, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend, Adding edge AI or computer vision to an existing diagnostic instrument | Industrial design and user research for a wearable, Human factors work on a home-use device |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Consulting |
Lemberg Solutions vs Delve: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | A single team covers electronics, firmware, cloud, data and AI, which cuts the hand-offs that usually slow connected-device programs |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics give early access to silicon support and reference designs |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with security designed into the product rather than bolted on before release |
| + | In-house electronics lab shortens prototype loops and lowers R&D risk before a design freeze |
| + | All intellectual property transfers to the client, and the cooperation model can be consulting, team extension or full product development |
| + | Practical edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need on-board inference |
| - | No in-house mass production, so a separate contract manufacturer is needed once the design is ready to scale |
| - | Does not obtain FDA or CE certification for clients; it provides technical documentation and engineering support for the client's own submission |
| - | Not ISO 13485 certified per the information reviewed, so buyers should confirm how it works inside their own medical QMS |
| Delve | |
|---|---|
| + | Strong user research and industrial design, important for patient-worn devices |
| + | Multiple US studios |
| + | Public wearable CGM experience |
| + | Bresslergroup brings a long patent and design-award record |
| - | Private-equity owned since 2021 and built through mergers |
| - | Medical is a large share, but consumer and industrial work compete for attention |
| - | ISO 13485 certification was not confirmed in our research |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend.
Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health, Automotive, Energy, Logistics.
Who should choose Delve?
A typical fit: industrial design and user research for a wearable.
Design research and industrial design depth from two long-established US studios. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Wearables & remote monitoring, Surgical & therapeutic devices, Consumer products, Industrial.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Delve
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Delve (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Delve
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Delve fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Adding edge AI or computer vision to an existing diagnostic instrument | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Industrial design and user research for a wearable | Limited | Strong | Delve |
| Human factors work on a home-use device | Limited | Strong | Delve |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Delve
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Medical Device Development projects. Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together.
Delve (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need human factors work on a home-use device. If your situation matches that, Delve is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Delve FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Delve?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: a single team covers electronics, firmware, cloud, data and AI, which cuts the hand-offs that usually slow connected-device programs. Delve's strongest advantage: strong user research and industrial design, important for patient-worn devices.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Delve differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed project, time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Delve uses time and materials, phased fixed project pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Delve?
Delve is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Delve?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together. Delve's primary differentiator is: design research and industrial design depth from two long-established US studios. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 200–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices vs Wearables & remote monitoring, Surgical & therapeutic devices).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.