Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Simbex (3.9/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected and smart medical devices, one engineering team. Simbex is the stronger option for sensor wearables and biomechanics research. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Simbex |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Lebanon, NH, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 11–100 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together | Biomechanics and sensor research background applied to wearable health devices |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, RTOS, FPGA | BLE, Embedded C/C++, Sensor fusion |
| Industries served | Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health, Automotive, Energy, Logistics | Wearables & remote monitoring, Sports technology, Digital health |
Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Founded in 2007, Lemberg Solutions builds both hardware and software, and has offices in Lviv, Hamburg, London and Kraków. For medical device teams it covers electrical engineering, firmware, RTOS and embedded Linux development, FPGA programming, GUI work, connectivity and IoT, edge AI and cybersecurity, so one vendor can own the device electronics, its embedded code and the cloud or mobile side that talks to it. Healthcare is one of its core industries alongside automotive, energy and logistics, and named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth. The company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification and runs its own hardware lab. It does not manufacture finished devices at volume and does not obtain regulatory clearance on a client's behalf; it supplies the engineering documentation the client's regulatory team needs.
Simbex
Simbex was founded in 2000 in Lebanon, New Hampshire, and works on product design, applied research and commercialization in medtech, health tech and sports technology. Riddell, the American football helmet maker and a long-time client, acquired it in April 2024. Its medical work includes RestEaze, a remote monitoring device for sleep disorder diagnosis built with Tanzen Medical, and fall-detection wearables. Team size estimates range from 11 to 100.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Simbex |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| SaMD & companion apps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connected devices & IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Industrial design & human factors | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mechanical engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| Device cybersecurity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Regulatory & QMS support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Manufacturing & scale-up | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Simbex |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C/C++ | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cloud (AWS/Azure) | ✓ | N/A |
| IEC 62304 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 14971 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 13485 QMS | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Simbex |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Simbex |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health | Wearables & remote monitoring, Sports technology, Digital health |
| Best use cases | Building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend, Adding edge AI or computer vision to an existing diagnostic instrument | Sensor-based wearable for remote monitoring, Biomechanics research study for a device concept |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | A single team covers electronics, firmware, cloud, data and AI, which cuts the hand-offs that usually slow connected-device programs |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics give early access to silicon support and reference designs |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with security designed into the product rather than bolted on before release |
| + | In-house electronics lab shortens prototype loops and lowers R&D risk before a design freeze |
| + | All intellectual property transfers to the client, and the cooperation model can be consulting, team extension or full product development |
| + | Practical edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need on-board inference |
| - | No in-house mass production, so a separate contract manufacturer is needed once the design is ready to scale |
| - | Does not obtain FDA or CE certification for clients; it provides technical documentation and engineering support for the client's own submission |
| - | Not ISO 13485 certified per the information reviewed, so buyers should confirm how it works inside their own medical QMS |
| Simbex | |
|---|---|
| + | Strong sensor and biomechanics research skills |
| + | Experience with wearable monitoring devices |
| + | Covers design through commercialization planning |
| + | Small team with direct access to principals |
| - | Owned by Riddell since April 2024, so sports technology may take priority over medical clients |
| - | Small team |
| - | Fewer regulated Class II and III device credits than medtech-only firms |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend.
Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health, Automotive, Energy, Logistics.
Who should choose Simbex?
A typical fit: sensor-based wearable for remote monitoring.
Biomechanics and sensor research background applied to wearable health devices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Wearables & remote monitoring, Sports technology, Digital health.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Simbex (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Simbex fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Adding edge AI or computer vision to an existing diagnostic instrument | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Sensor-based wearable for remote monitoring | Limited | Strong | Simbex |
| Biomechanics research study for a device concept | Limited | Strong | Simbex |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Medical Device Development projects. Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together.
Simbex (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need biomechanics research study for a device concept. If your situation matches that, Simbex is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Simbex FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Simbex?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: a single team covers electronics, firmware, cloud, data and AI, which cuts the hand-offs that usually slow connected-device programs. Simbex's strongest advantage: strong sensor and biomechanics research skills.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Simbex differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed project, time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Simbex uses time and materials, fixed project pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Simbex?
Simbex is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Simbex?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together. Simbex's primary differentiator is: biomechanics and sensor research background applied to wearable health devices. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 11–100), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices vs Wearables & remote monitoring, Sports technology).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.