Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Veranex (4.2/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected and smart medical devices, one engineering team. Veranex is the stronger option for device design plus clinical trials and reimbursement. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Veranex |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2021 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Raleigh, NC, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 800+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together | One contract can cover engineering, clinical studies, regulatory strategy and reimbursement |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, time and materials, dedicated team | Fixed project, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, RTOS, FPGA | ISO 13485 QMS, SolidWorks, Embedded C/C++ |
| Industries served | Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health, Automotive, Energy, Logistics | Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices, Drug delivery, Digital health |
Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Founded in 2007, Lemberg Solutions builds both hardware and software, and has offices in Lviv, Hamburg, London and Kraków. For medical device teams it covers electrical engineering, firmware, RTOS and embedded Linux development, FPGA programming, GUI work, connectivity and IoT, edge AI and cybersecurity, so one vendor can own the device electronics, its embedded code and the cloud or mobile side that talks to it. Healthcare is one of its core industries alongside automotive, energy and logistics, and named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth. The company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification and runs its own hardware lab. It does not manufacture finished devices at volume and does not obtain regulatory clearance on a client's behalf; it supplies the engineering documentation the client's regulatory team needs.
Veranex
Veranex was formed in 2021 by Summit Partners, which combined Providence-based device developer Ximedica (founded 1985) with Quartesian and Boston Healthcare Associates. It has since acquired Experien Group, IMM Recherche, the healthcare design firm Worrell, Fusion Biotec and Horus Scientific. Headquartered in Raleigh, North Carolina, it reports more than 800 staff and offers product design and engineering, clinical research (CRO) services, regulatory work and market access consulting.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Veranex |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✗ |
| SaMD & companion apps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connected devices & IoT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Industrial design & human factors | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mechanical engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| Device cybersecurity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Regulatory & QMS support | ✗ | ✓ |
| Manufacturing & scale-up | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Veranex |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C/C++ | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| Cloud (AWS/Azure) | ✓ | N/A |
| IEC 62304 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 14971 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 13485 QMS | N/A | ✓ |
| Qt | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Veranex |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Consulting, Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Veranex |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health | Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices, Drug delivery |
| Best use cases | Building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend, Adding edge AI or computer vision to an existing diagnostic instrument | Startup that needs design, a clinical study and an FDA strategy from one partner, Human-centered redesign of a surgical instrument |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Consulting |
Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | A single team covers electronics, firmware, cloud, data and AI, which cuts the hand-offs that usually slow connected-device programs |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics give early access to silicon support and reference designs |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with security designed into the product rather than bolted on before release |
| + | In-house electronics lab shortens prototype loops and lowers R&D risk before a design freeze |
| + | All intellectual property transfers to the client, and the cooperation model can be consulting, team extension or full product development |
| + | Practical edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need on-board inference |
| - | No in-house mass production, so a separate contract manufacturer is needed once the design is ready to scale |
| - | Does not obtain FDA or CE certification for clients; it provides technical documentation and engineering support for the client's own submission |
| - | Not ISO 13485 certified per the information reviewed, so buyers should confirm how it works inside their own medical QMS |
| Veranex | |
|---|---|
| + | Rare combination of engineering with CRO, regulatory and market access services |
| + | Ximedica brings decades of ISO 13485 device development experience |
| + | Worrell adds human-centered design for healthcare |
| + | Large enough to run several workstreams at once |
| - | Built from many acquisitions since 2021, so teams and processes are still being joined up |
| - | Private-equity ownership by Summit Partners |
| - | Buyers who only need engineering may pay for a broader structure than they use |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend.
Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health, Automotive, Energy, Logistics.
Who should choose Veranex?
A typical fit: startup that needs design, a clinical study and an FDA strategy from one partner.
One contract can cover engineering, clinical studies, regulatory strategy and reimbursement. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices, Drug delivery, Digital health.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Veranex (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Veranex fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Adding edge AI or computer vision to an existing diagnostic instrument | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Startup that needs design, a clinical study and an FDA strategy from one partner | Limited | Strong | Veranex |
| Human-centered redesign of a surgical instrument | Limited | Strong | Veranex |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Medical Device Development projects. Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together.
Veranex (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need human-centered redesign of a surgical instrument. If your situation matches that, Veranex is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Veranex FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Veranex?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: a single team covers electronics, firmware, cloud, data and AI, which cuts the hand-offs that usually slow connected-device programs. Veranex's strongest advantage: rare combination of engineering with CRO, regulatory and market access services.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Veranex differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed project, time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Veranex uses fixed project, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Veranex?
Veranex is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Veranex?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together. Veranex's primary differentiator is: one contract can cover engineering, clinical studies, regulatory strategy and reimbursement. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 800+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices vs Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.