Best Medical Device Development Companies

Team Consulting vs Plexus: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Team Consulting (4.3/5) edges ahead of Plexus (3.8/5) overall. Team Consulting is the better choice for Inhalers, injectors and human-factors-heavy devices. Plexus is the stronger option for complex capital equipment needing build and sustaining. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Team Consulting vs Plexus: head-to-head summary

Criterion Team Consulting Plexus
Founded 1986 1979
HQ Ickleton, Cambridge, UK Neenah, WI, USA
Team size 140–190 ~20,000
Rating 4.3 / 5 3.8 / 5
Primary differentiator Three decades of medical-only industrial design and human factors, especially for drug delivery Engineering, NPI and sustaining services for low-to-mid volume, high-complexity medical equipment
Pricing model Time and materials, phased fixed project NPI contract, manufacturing supply agreement
Min. engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Primary tech stack SolidWorks, Mechanical simulation, Usability engineering PCB design, PCB assembly, Embedded C/C++
Industries served Drug delivery, Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Aerospace, Industrial

Team Consulting vs Plexus: overview

Team Consulting

Team Consulting began in 1986 as a general product development consultancy started by five former colleagues and has worked mainly in the medical sector since the early 1990s. It is employee-owned and based in a converted barn in Ickleton, near Cambridge, with somewhere between 140 and 190 staff depending on the source. Its best-known work is in inhaled and injectable drug delivery devices, where it combines industrial design, mechanical engineering and human factors.

Plexus

Plexus Corp. is a NASDAQ-listed company headquartered in Neenah, Wisconsin, that offers design and development, supply chain, new product introduction, manufacturing and sustaining services. Healthcare and life sciences is one of its three markets alongside aerospace and defense and industrial. Its healthcare work includes surgical equipment, imaging equipment and diagnostic instruments. The company has around 20,000 employees in total, though only part of that is healthcare.

Services and capabilities: Team Consulting vs Plexus

Capability Team Consulting Plexus
Electronics & PCB design ✗ ✓
Firmware & embedded software ✗ ✗
SaMD & companion apps ✗ ✗
Connected devices & IoT ✗ ✗
Industrial design & human factors ✓ ✗
Mechanical engineering ✓ ✓
Device cybersecurity ✗ ✗
Regulatory & QMS support ✓ ✓
Manufacturing & scale-up ✗ ✓

Tech stack comparison: Team Consulting vs Plexus

Framework / platform Team Consulting Plexus
Embedded C/C++ N/A ✓
Embedded Linux N/A N/A
RTOS N/A N/A
BLE N/A N/A
Cloud (AWS/Azure) N/A N/A
IEC 62304 N/A N/A
ISO 14971 N/A N/A
ISO 13485 QMS ✓ ✓
Qt N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Team Consulting vs Plexus

Criterion Team Consulting Plexus
Minimum engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Engagement models Consulting, Fixed project, Time & materials Fixed project, Manufacturing contract
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Team Consulting vs Plexus

Dimension Team Consulting Plexus
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Drug delivery, Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Aerospace
Best use cases Designing a dry powder inhaler or autoinjector, Formative and summative usability studies Building and sustaining a diagnostic imaging subsystem, Electronics redesign for component obsolescence
Typical project type Consulting Fixed project

Team Consulting vs Plexus: pros and cons

Team Consulting
+ Medical and pharma work has been its main business for over 30 years
+ Human factors engineering is one of the strongest in the UK for drug delivery
+ Employee ownership supports long-term client relationships
+ Industrial design quality is high, which matters for patient-handled devices
- Electronics and connected-device software are a smaller part of its work than mechanics and design
- No manufacturing; transfer to a CM is required
- UK rates and location may not suit US startups on tight budgets
Plexus
+ Strong with complex, lower-volume capital equipment such as imaging and surgical systems
+ Offers product engineering as well as manufacturing
+ Sustaining engineering over long product lives
+ Public company with transparent financial reporting
- Generalist manufacturer; healthcare competes with aerospace and industrial for capacity
- Not a fit for early-stage concept work
- Most engineering engagements lead toward a manufacturing contract

Who should choose Team Consulting?

A typical fit: designing a dry powder inhaler or autoinjector.

Three decades of medical-only industrial design and human factors, especially for drug delivery. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Drug delivery, Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices.

Who should choose Plexus?

A typical fit: building and sustaining a diagnostic imaging subsystem.

Engineering, NPI and sustaining services for low-to-mid volume, high-complexity medical equipment. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Aerospace, Industrial.

Decision matrix: Team Consulting vs Plexus

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Team Consulting
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Team Consulting (Not disclosed) vs Plexus (Not disclosed)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Plexus
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Team Consulting vs Plexus

Use case Team Consulting fit Plexus fit Winner
Designing a dry powder inhaler or autoinjector Strong Limited Team Consulting
Formative and summative usability studies Strong Limited Team Consulting
Building and sustaining a diagnostic imaging subsystem Limited Strong Plexus
Electronics redesign for component obsolescence Limited Strong Plexus

Verdict: Team Consulting vs Plexus

Team Consulting (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Medical Device Development projects. Three decades of medical-only industrial design and human factors, especially for drug delivery.

Plexus (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need electronics redesign for component obsolescence. If your situation matches that, Plexus is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Team Consulting vs Plexus FAQ

Is Team Consulting better than Plexus?

Team Consulting (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Team Consulting's strongest advantage: medical and pharma work has been its main business for over 30 years. Plexus's strongest advantage: strong with complex, lower-volume capital equipment such as imaging and surgical systems.

How do Team Consulting and Plexus differ in pricing?

Team Consulting uses time and materials, phased fixed project pricing. Plexus uses npi contract, manufacturing supply agreement pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Team Consulting or Plexus?

Team Consulting is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Team Consulting and Plexus?

Team Consulting's primary differentiator is: three decades of medical-only industrial design and human factors, especially for drug delivery. Plexus's primary differentiator is: Engineering, NPI and sustaining services for low-to-mid volume, high-complexity medical equipment. They also differ in team size (140–190 vs ~20,000), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Drug delivery, Surgical & therapeutic devices vs Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.