Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Veranex (4.2/5) edges ahead of Jabil Healthcare (3.8/5) overall. Veranex is the better choice for device design plus clinical trials and reimbursement. Jabil Healthcare is the stronger option for global production capacity for cleared devices. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Veranex | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2021 | 1966 |
| HQ | Raleigh, NC, USA | St. Petersburg, FL, USA |
| Team size | 800+ | ~20,000 (healthcare) |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | One contract can cover engineering, clinical studies, regulatory strategy and reimbursement | Global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, time and materials | Manufacturing supply agreement, NPI contract |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | ISO 13485 QMS, SolidWorks, Embedded C/C++ | Injection molding, Automated assembly, PCB assembly |
| Industries served | Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices, Drug delivery, Digital health | Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Wearables & remote monitoring, Consumer health |
Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare: overview
Veranex
Veranex was formed in 2021 by Summit Partners, which combined Providence-based device developer Ximedica (founded 1985) with Quartesian and Boston Healthcare Associates. It has since acquired Experien Group, IMM Recherche, the healthcare design firm Worrell, Fusion Biotec and Horus Scientific. Headquartered in Raleigh, North Carolina, it reports more than 800 staff and offers product design and engineering, clinical research (CRO) services, regulatory work and market access consulting.
Jabil Healthcare
Jabil Healthcare was formed in 2020 when Jabil combined its Nypro business with its orthopedics, spine and trauma units. At launch it had nearly 20,000 employees and more than 35 sites, and its factories producing finished medical devices are FDA registered. It covers minimally invasive devices, surgical robotics, complex catheters, diabetes care and consumer health, and the acquisition of CDMO Pii extended it into drug development and aseptic fill-finish. Jabil reported $8.3 billion in company-wide revenue for its second fiscal quarter of 2026.
Services and capabilities: Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare
| Capability | Veranex | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✗ | ✗ |
| SaMD & companion apps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connected devices & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Industrial design & human factors | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mechanical engineering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Device cybersecurity | ✗ | ✗ |
| Regulatory & QMS support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Manufacturing & scale-up | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare
| Framework / platform | Veranex | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C/C++ | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Cloud (AWS/Azure) | N/A | N/A |
| IEC 62304 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 14971 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 13485 QMS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Qt | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare
| Criterion | Veranex | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Fixed project, Time & materials | Manufacturing contract |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare
| Dimension | Veranex | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices, Drug delivery | Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Wearables & remote monitoring |
| Best use cases | Startup that needs design, a clinical study and an FDA strategy from one partner, Human-centered redesign of a surgical instrument | Scaling production of a cleared diabetes device, Global manufacturing of a surgical robotics subsystem |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Manufacturing contract |
Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare: pros and cons
| Veranex | |
|---|---|
| + | Rare combination of engineering with CRO, regulatory and market access services |
| + | Ximedica brings decades of ISO 13485 device development experience |
| + | Worrell adds human-centered design for healthcare |
| + | Large enough to run several workstreams at once |
| - | Built from many acquisitions since 2021, so teams and processes are still being joined up |
| - | Private-equity ownership by Summit Partners |
| - | Buyers who only need engineering may pay for a broader structure than they use |
| Jabil Healthcare | |
|---|---|
| + | One of the largest healthcare manufacturing networks in the world |
| + | FDA-registered sites for finished devices |
| + | Strong supply chain management during component shortages |
| + | Covers drug delivery through the Pii acquisition |
| - | Built for production volume; early design and invention are outside its main business |
| - | Small companies may struggle to get attention |
| - | Engineering support is tied to manufacturing programs |
Who should choose Veranex?
A typical fit: startup that needs design, a clinical study and an FDA strategy from one partner.
One contract can cover engineering, clinical studies, regulatory strategy and reimbursement. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices, Drug delivery, Digital health.
Who should choose Jabil Healthcare?
A typical fit: scaling production of a cleared diabetes device.
Global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Wearables & remote monitoring, Consumer health.
Decision matrix: Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Veranex |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Veranex (Not disclosed) vs Jabil Healthcare (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Veranex |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare
| Use case | Veranex fit | Jabil Healthcare fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Startup that needs design, a clinical study and an FDA strategy from one partner | Strong | Limited | Veranex |
| Human-centered redesign of a surgical instrument | Strong | Limited | Veranex |
| Scaling production of a cleared diabetes device | Limited | Strong | Jabil Healthcare |
| Global manufacturing of a surgical robotics subsystem | Limited | Strong | Jabil Healthcare |
Verdict: Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare
Veranex (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Medical Device Development projects. One contract can cover engineering, clinical studies, regulatory strategy and reimbursement.
Jabil Healthcare (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need global manufacturing of a surgical robotics subsystem. If your situation matches that, Jabil Healthcare is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Veranex vs Jabil Healthcare FAQ
Is Veranex better than Jabil Healthcare?
Veranex (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Veranex's strongest advantage: rare combination of engineering with CRO, regulatory and market access services. Jabil Healthcare's strongest advantage: one of the largest healthcare manufacturing networks in the world.
How do Veranex and Jabil Healthcare differ in pricing?
Veranex uses fixed project, time and materials pricing. Jabil Healthcare uses manufacturing supply agreement, npi contract pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Veranex or Jabil Healthcare?
Jabil Healthcare is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Veranex and Jabil Healthcare?
Veranex's primary differentiator is: one contract can cover engineering, clinical studies, regulatory strategy and reimbursement. Jabil Healthcare's primary differentiator is: global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands. They also differ in team size (800+ vs ~20,000 (healthcare)), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Surgical & therapeutic devices, Diagnostics & lab devices vs Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.